Five NATO allies block military aid spending target for Ukraine
Five NATO members have blocked a proposal from Secretary General Mark Rutte that would have required every alliance member to dedicate 0.25% of national GDP to military aid for Ukraine, exposing divisions within the bloc ahead of the NATO summit scheduled for July in Ankara.
The United Kingdom, France, Spain, Italy and Canada opposed the spending target, preventing the proposal from advancing because NATO decisions require unanimous approval from all 32 member states. Speaking during a ministerial meeting in Helsingborg, Sweden, on May 20, Rutte acknowledged that the initiative lacked sufficient backing. He said there was “a lot of opposition” to setting a fixed 0.25% threshold for military support to Kyiv.
If adopted, the proposal would have nearly tripled annual military assistance flows to Ukraine, reaching an estimated $143 billion based on NATO calculations tied to the alliance’s combined GDP. Several member states already spending above the proposed level, including the Netherlands, Poland and Nordic and Baltic countries, supported the plan and pushed for stronger burden-sharing commitments across the alliance.
The disagreement has drawn attention to disparities in military contributions among NATO members. Britain remains one of Ukraine’s largest military backers after the United States and Germany, yet its annual contribution still falls below the proposed threshold. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has pledged roughly £3 billion per year in military support, equivalent to about 0.1% of British GDP.
The debate unfolded as NATO foreign ministers gathered in Helsingborg to prepare for the alliance summit in Ankara, Turkey, scheduled for July 7 and 8. The meeting is expected to focus on converting defense spending pledges into operational military capabilities and industrial production capacity, following the alliance’s broader commitment made in The Hague in 2025 to move toward defense expenditures equivalent to 5% of GDP.
Rutte described the proposal as an intentional attempt to reopen discussions on burden-sharing within NATO. He argued that only a limited number of allies are carrying the bulk of support for Ukraine, particularly through the delivery of advanced US-made defense systems such as Patriot missile interceptors.
The episode also underscores growing frustration among eastern and northern NATO members that spend a larger share of their economies on Ukraine-related aid than several larger Western allies. Data from the Kiel Institute for the World Economy indicate that Poland, the Netherlands and Baltic and Nordic countries already meet or exceed the 0.25% benchmark proposed by Rutte.
With the proposal effectively abandoned before the Ankara summit, NATO leaders now face renewed uncertainty over how long-term military support for Ukraine will be financed and distributed among alliance members, as Kyiv continues to depend heavily on Western weapons and air defense systems.
-
17:30
-
17:15
-
17:00
-
16:45
-
16:30
-
16:20
-
16:15
-
16:14
-
16:00
-
15:50
-
15:45
-
15:32
-
15:30
-
15:20
-
15:15
-
15:00
-
14:50
-
14:45
-
14:30
-
14:27
-
14:18
-
14:15
-
14:00
-
14:00
-
13:45
-
13:43
-
13:37
-
13:30
-
13:16
-
13:15
-
13:05
-
13:00
-
12:45
-
12:30
-
12:15
-
12:00
-
11:45
-
11:30
-
11:25
-
11:20
-
11:15
-
11:00
-
10:55
-
10:45
-
10:30
-
10:28
-
10:15
-
10:04
-
10:00
-
09:57
-
09:54
-
09:45
-
09:41
-
09:30
-
09:25
-
09:15
-
09:00
-
08:53
-
08:45
-
08:33
-
08:30
-
08:18
-
08:15
-
08:00
-
07:56
-
07:45
-
07:39
-
07:30
-
07:20
-
07:15
-
07:00
-
06:59