Trump’s Iran strikes represent major foreign policy gamble
President Donald Trump’s decision to launch large-scale military strikes against Iran marks one of the most significant and controversial foreign policy moves of his presidency. The United States and Israel began coordinated attacks this weekend, describing the campaign as necessary to counter perceived threats from Iran’s missile infrastructure and military capabilities.
Experts say the operation represents a clear departure from Trump’s earlier preference for limited strikes in distant theaters, shifting instead toward a sustained confrontation that could have widespread consequences across the oil-rich Middle East. The stated goal of forcing “regime change” in Tehran through air power has historically proven difficult without substantial ground involvement, and many analysts doubt such an outcome can be achieved.
Critics argue that the president provided limited explanation to the public and Congress before moving forward, raising concerns about legal authority and long-term objectives. Supporters, including allied governments, emphasize the need to dismantle Iran’s military threat and prevent future destabilizing actions. The situation remains fluid, with diplomatic efforts ongoing even as military operations continue.
-
22:32
-
22:20
-
22:00
-
21:55
-
21:50
-
21:23
-
21:14
-
20:55
-
20:36
-
20:30
-
20:28
-
20:00
-
19:32
-
19:30
-
19:20
-
19:03
-
19:00
-
17:57
-
17:30
-
17:19
-
17:13
-
17:00
-
16:45
-
16:30
-
16:07
-
16:00
-
16:00
-
15:53
-
15:34
-
15:30
-
15:00
-
14:52
-
14:25
-
14:16
-
14:08
-
14:00
-
13:42
-
13:33
-
13:22
-
13:09
-
13:00
-
12:57
-
12:51
-
12:48
-
12:46
-
12:40
-
12:39
-
12:32
-
12:31
-
12:30
-
12:26
-
12:21
-
12:20
-
12:16
-
12:10
-
12:09
-
12:00
-
12:00
-
11:52
-
11:45
-
11:37
-
11:31
-
11:26
-
11:19
-
11:14
-
11:02
-
10:50
-
10:40
-
10:20
-
09:50
-
09:20
-
08:50
-
08:20
-
07:50
-
07:20
-
07:00