-
17:00
-
16:30
-
16:00
-
15:30
-
15:00
-
14:30
-
14:00
-
13:50
-
13:30
-
13:20
-
13:00
-
12:50
-
12:20
-
12:00
-
11:50
-
11:30
-
11:20
-
11:00
-
10:50
-
10:30
-
10:20
-
10:00
-
09:50
-
09:30
-
09:20
-
09:00
-
08:50
-
08:30
-
08:20
-
08:00
-
07:50
-
07:30
-
07:00
-
17:50
U.S. justice releases limited files related to Jeffrey Epstein investigation
The U.S. Department of Justice has released a limited selection of documents connected to the long-running investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, following the adoption of a bipartisan law requiring greater transparency. The publication, however, has fallen short of public expectations, as many of the files remain heavily redacted or incomplete.
The documents, numbering in the thousands, include photographs, call records, interview transcripts and excerpts from grand jury proceedings. While they offer additional insight into Epstein’s social circle, including images of well-known public figures, they provide little new information about the broader scope of the criminal investigations or the potential involvement of influential individuals.
The partial disclosure has drawn criticism from lawmakers across party lines, who argue that the Justice Department failed to fully comply with the legal deadline set by Congress. Several officials noted that many of the released materials had already been publicly available and that key records remain withheld under legal exemptions, particularly those intended to protect victims.
Justice Department officials have defended the approach, stating that the review process is ongoing and that additional documents are expected to be released in the coming weeks. They emphasized that certain redactions are necessary to safeguard privacy and prevent further harm to survivors.
The Epstein case has long fueled public mistrust and calls for accountability, particularly over past prosecutorial decisions and the circumstances surrounding his death in federal custody in 2019. For victims and advocates, the latest release underscores the demand for full disclosure and renewed scrutiny of how the case was handled over the years.
