US Rebukes Israeli PM for 'Maximalist' Approach to Ceasefire

Tensions between the United States and Israel have intensified as a senior US administration official publicly rebuked Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for what was described as "maximalist statements" regarding a potential ceasefire in Gaza. This rare public criticism comes amid intense diplomatic efforts by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken to broker a deal between Israel and Hamas.

The controversy erupted after reports surfaced of Netanyahu's comments to families of hostages held in Gaza. According to Israeli media, the Prime Minister claimed to have "convinced" Blinken that Israeli troops should remain in strategic areas of Gaza, including along the southern border with Egypt, which he referred to as "strategic military and political assets."

These remarks appeared to have struck a nerve within the US administration. Speaking anonymously, a senior US official commented, "We saw the Prime Minister's comments, specifically on some of these items. We are certainly not going to negotiate in public, but I can say that the only thing Secretary Blinken and the United States are convinced of is the need to get a ceasefire proposal across the finish line."

The official further emphasized that such "maximalist statements" are "not constructive to achieving a ceasefire deal" and "risk the progress of working-level and technical talks when both parties agree to a bridging proposal."

This diplomatic tension is unfolding against the backdrop of Blinken's whirlwind tour of the Middle East. The Secretary of State had a marathon three-hour meeting with Netanyahu in Jerusalem on Monday, followed by talks with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi in El-Alamein and further discussions in Doha, Qatar.

In a significant revelation, Blinken disclosed to the BBC that the American bridging proposal includes a "detailed plan" for the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. "The agreement is very clear on the schedule and locations of IDF [Israel Defense Forces] withdrawals from Gaza, and Israel has agreed to that," Blinken stated.

When questioned about Netanyahu's reported claims, Blinken carefully distanced himself, saying, "I cannot speak to what he is quoted as saying, but I can speak to what I heard from him directly yesterday [Monday] during our three-hour meeting. That included Israel's endorsement of the bridging proposal and the detailed plan. Among other things, that plan includes a clear schedule and locations for withdrawals."

The Secretary of State refrained from commenting on whether the proposal called for a "full withdrawal," maintaining a level of diplomatic discretion about the details of the plan.

These developments underscore the delicate balancing act the US is attempting. On one hand, Washington is pushing for a ceasefire and the release of hostages, while on the other, it is navigating the complex political landscape of its long-standing ally, Israel.

The situation is further complicated by Hamas's stance on the negotiations. The group has characterized the latest ceasefire proposals as "a coup" against previously agreed-upon terms. Hamas insists that any ceasefire plan for Gaza should be based on the state of negotiations as of July, rather than on new rounds of talks.

Egyptian officials have also expressed strong opposition to the idea of Israeli troops remaining along Egypt's border in Gaza, adding another layer of complexity to the negotiations.

As diplomatic efforts continue, the contrasting public statements from US officials and the Israeli Prime Minister highlight the challenges in reaching a consensus. The coming days and weeks will be crucial in determining whether these differences can be reconciled to achieve a lasting ceasefire in Gaza.

The international community is closely watching these high-stakes negotiations, hoping for an end to the conflict and the safe return of hostages. As this diplomatic dance continues, the world waits to see if a breakthrough can be achieved amid these heightened tensions between long-standing allies.