- 12:40The transformative impact of generative artificial intelligence on the job market
- 12:36Spain leads NATO's most ambitious naval exercises of the year
- 12:10Khaoula Ramdi leads Atlas Capital Private Equity into new ventures
- 12:09New Zealand secures spot for 2026 World Cup
- 11:40Egypt and Palestine explore avenues for a Gaza ceasefire
- 11:38Grand Prix Hassan II 2025: A Bold New Era of Tennis and Spectator Experience
- 11:10Italy proposes new technology for football officiating
- 11:05Turkey's Kizilelma Drone: A Strategic Addition to Morocco's Air Power
- 10:40Agadir emerges as a top tourist destination for British travelers
-
Prayer times
RABAT2025-03-24
Follow us on Facebook
Musk Extends Deadline for Federal Workers to Justify Their Jobs
Elon Musk has granted U.S. federal employees an additional opportunity to justify their roles after the initial deadline passed on Tuesday, leaving many government workers uncertain about their job security. Despite his directive, several federal agencies instructed employees to ignore his request, at least temporarily.
As the wealthiest person in the world and a key supporter of former President Donald Trump, Musk had initially given federal employees until the end of Monday to outline their work achievements via email. This initiative is part of his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) strategy to reduce federal staffing and expenses.
"At the President's discretion, they will be given another chance," Musk stated on X, the platform he owns. "Failure to respond a second time will result in termination," he added, without specifying a new deadline.
The directive created confusion across various agencies, some of which, led by Trump allies, advised employees to ignore the email. Musk criticized the lack of responses, calling the request “trivial” and attributing the lack of compliance to managerial influence.
More than two million federal employees received an email from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) on Saturday, instructing them to submit a brief report on their work accomplishments. Musk had previously announced that failure to respond would be considered a resignation.
Trump defended Musk’s approach, calling it "ingenious" in exposing whether employees were actually working. He suggested that non-responders could be considered absent or disengaged.
Musk reinforced this sentiment on X, stating, "This was a simple test to see if employees were responsive. Many will soon face a harsh reality check."
Confusion and Opposition
Several government agencies, including the Defense Department, advised employees to pause any responses to Musk’s email. Concerns over cybersecurity were also raised, with the Department of Health and Human Services warning staff that foreign actors could access their responses.
While some agencies disregarded the directive, others, such as the Treasury Department, complied, stating that Musk’s request aimed to enhance workforce accountability, aligning government practices with private-sector standards.
As tensions escalated, an anonymous administration official advised employees to follow their agencies' guidance regarding the email.
Legal and Political Pushback
Unions swiftly opposed Musk’s directive, with the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) pledging to challenge any unlawful dismissals. Public opinion polls indicate widespread disapproval of disruptions to federal employment.
Even within Trump’s Republican Party, concerns have arisen. Senator John Curtis of Utah urged Musk to exercise compassion, emphasizing that federal employees have families and financial obligations.
Legal challenges against Musk's directives have produced mixed outcomes. On Monday, a federal judge ruled that the Education Department and OPM could not share sensitive information with DOGE, adding further complications to Musk’s efforts to restructure the federal workforce.
Comments (0)