- 08:39King Mohammed VI congratulates Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney
- 08:30Strengthening ties: Morocco and Zambia’s commitment to bilateral cooperation
- 16:50France-Algeria tensions spotlight Paris Grand Mosque's Ramadan iftar
- 16:40Surge in Spanish remittances positions Morocco as a leading recipient
- 16:20Moroccans lead foreign workers in Spain's social security system
- 16:10Ryad Mezzour: Morocco remains committed to the AfCFTA
- 15:50Tensions escalate as Syrian, Lebanese armies clash over soldiers' deaths
- 15:42Agreement between Mazón and Vox to approve Valencian reconstruction budgets
- 15:30Launch of BVS in Casablanca: Morocco’s new venture studio pioneer
Follow us on Facebook
Turkish politician faces trial for alleged hate incitement
A prominent Turkish political leader is facing trial on charges of inciting public hatred through social media. The court has ordered the detention of Umit Ozdag, leader of a key political party, for allegedly making inflammatory remarks.
Ozdag was detained after reportedly criticizing President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, stating that “even the crusades had not caused as much harm to Turkiye as Erdogan.” While initially released on charges of insulting the president, prosecutors later issued an arrest warrant accusing him of inciting societal division.
Authorities cited 11 of Ozdag’s social media posts as evidence, including allegations linking him to riots against Syrian refugees in the Kayseri province last year, where numerous homes and businesses were attacked.
In response, Ozdag declared that his arrest represented an attack on those he speaks for, including workers and retirees struggling under economic hardship. He vowed to continue voicing dissent, stating, “You can arrest me, but you cannot silence me without killing me.”
Ozdag, a former academic and vocal critic of the country’s refugee policies, has called for the repatriation of millions of Syrian refugees.
Several opposition figures, including leaders from the main opposition party, have condemned the arrest. They argue that it undermines judicial independence and democracy, labeling it a politically motivated act.
Comments (0)