- 09:00ONCF de Marruecos asegura 14 mil millones de dólares para un proyecto ferroviario clave
- 08:30Syrian Rebels Declare Assad’s Rule Over Amid Dramatic Offensive
- 07:52Moroccan Diplomacy’s Evolution: King Mohammed VI’s Strategic Vision
- 07:38China Explores Strategic Partnership with Morocco Amid Western Trade Barriers
- 16:10 Morocco as the Embodiment of Civilizational Alliance and Global Harmony
- 15:40Notre Dame Cathedral Reopens Five Years After Devastating Fire
- 15:03Urgent Action Needed to Combat Cholera Outbreak in South Sudan
- 14:40Empowering Moroccan Enterprises A New Initiative to Boost Skills and Employment
- 14:02China's Bold Step Towards Central Asia: A New Railway Connection
Follow us on Facebook
Trump's Strategic: Shift Proposals to End the Russia-Ukraine War
As President-elect Donald Trump prepares to take office, his national security adviser pick, Mike Waltz, is evaluating several proposals to bring an end to the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine. These proposals include a variety of diplomatic and military strategies, all aimed at reaching a ceasefire and a negotiated settlement to the conflict.
While specific details of the strategy remain under review, sources indicate that the Trump administration may push for an early ceasefire to temporarily freeze hostilities, allowing both sides to enter negotiations. Additionally, Trump officials are expected to urge European allies and NATO to take on a larger share of the financial burden for supporting Ukraine. Waltz has emphasized the need to "bring this to a responsible end" by restoring peace and deterrence, while staying ahead of potential escalations in the conflict.
Before the election, Trump repeatedly asserted that the war between Russia and Ukraine would not have occurred if he had been president. He even suggested that he could have ended the war before assuming office. During a 2024 presidential debate, Trump refused to commit to Ukraine's defeat of Russia, instead suggesting that Ukraine should consider making concessions to Moscow. This rhetoric has fueled ongoing speculation about his approach to the war, with various plans currently under review.
One of the prominent proposals being considered by the Trump team comes from Gen. Keith Kellogg, who served as a national security adviser in the first Trump administration. Kellogg’s plan calls for continued U.S. military aid to Ukraine, but with conditions that Ukraine must participate in peace talks with Russia. Furthermore, the proposal suggests a formal U.S. policy shift toward seeking a ceasefire and a negotiated settlement. Kellogg's plan also advocates for delaying Ukraine's NATO membership, a measure designed to pressure Russia into engaging in discussions.
Additionally, Waltz has been reviewing a separate proposal backed by former U.S. Ambassador to Germany Ric Grenell. Grenell has expressed support for creating "autonomous regions" within Ukraine, although the specifics of this concept have not been fully explained. Another idea that has emerged is allowing Russia to retain the territory it currently controls in exchange for Ukraine's eventual NATO membership—a concept that remains controversial and would likely require careful diplomatic maneuvering.
Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, has stressed that while he hopes for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, he remains skeptical about the idea of a ceasefire without security guarantees from Western allies. Zelensky has highlighted the risks of an unfavorable peace agreement, noting that previous ceasefire attempts in 2014 failed and resulted in significant territorial losses for Ukraine. He remains cautious about any proposals that could undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty or lead to a hasty and unjust settlement.
Trump's national security team, including key figures like Sebastian Gorka, has signaled that the incoming administration is considering a range of options to pressure both Russia and Ukraine into negotiations. Gorka has suggested that the Trump administration could increase military support to Ukraine, especially if Russia refuses to engage in peace talks. Furthermore, Trump officials are reportedly prepared to use financial and military aid as leverage, potentially withholding further support if Ukraine does not show a willingness to negotiate.
While the Biden administration recently authorized Ukraine to use U.S.-made long-range missiles against Russian targets, the Trump team is expected to take a more aggressive stance in its diplomatic and military approach. However, the ultimate strategy remains uncertain, as Trump is known for shifting positions on foreign policy matters. As Waltz and his team continue to explore various paths forward, the war in Ukraine remains one of the most pressing challenges facing the next U.S. administration.
In the coming months, the Trump administration’s actions will reveal the full extent of its strategy for ending the war. As the situation continues to evolve, both U.S. and Ukrainian officials will need to navigate complex political and military dynamics to reach a resolution that ensures peace and security in the region.