Intensified Crackdown in Hong Kong: 14 Pro-Democracy Activists Convicted of Subversion

In a sweeping blow to the pro-democracy movement in Hong Kong, 14 activists have been found guilty of subversion under the controversial National Security Law imposed by Beijing. This landmark case represents the largest application of the law to date, further escalating concerns over the erosion of civil liberties in the semi-autonomous territory.

Former lawmakers Leung Kwok-hung and Helena Wong, journalist-turned-campaigner Gwyneth Ho, and ordinary Hong Kongers like nurse Winnie Yu, who participated in the mass protests of 2019, are among the convicted. Their crime? Organizing an unofficial primary election in 2020 to select candidates for the legislative council.

The court, in a stunning ruling on Thursday, agreed with the prosecution's argument that the activists' actions would have "created a constitutional crisis for Hong Kong" had they been elected to the legislature. Letters, campaign materials, and evidence found during their arrests more than three years ago were cited as proof of their alleged subversive intent.

Only two defendants, former district councillors Lawrence Lau and Lee Yue-Shun, were acquitted, as the court could not establish their involvement in the "scheme" or their intention to subvert state power. However, the justice department has vowed to appeal these acquittals, underscoring the government's unwavering stance.

The 47 activists on trial represent the diverse and universal yearning for democracy and freedom among Hong Kong's citizens, according to Simon Cheng, who himself faced charges under the National Security Law before fleeing and seeking asylum in the UK.

The case has drawn immense attention as a litmus test for Hong Kong's civil liberties under Beijing's tightening grip. Alongside the trial of billionaire Jimmy Lai, it has highlighted the growing criticism that the National Security Law is being used to silence dissent. China, however, maintains that the law has restored stability in the wake of the 2019 protests and is essential for maintaining order.

Hong Kong officials have hailed the law's nearly 100% conviction rate, but legal experts argue that this statistic reflects the law's use as a tool to crush dissent. Nearly 300 individuals have been arrested under the legislation for a wide range of acts.

Sentencing for the 14 convicted activists is expected at a later date, with the remaining 31 who pleaded guilty also awaiting their fate. Subversion carries a maximum term of life imprisonment, and it remains unclear whether a guilty plea will warrant a reduced sentence under the National Security Law.

Many of the guilty pleas were likely "pragmatic decisions," according to Cheng, as activists recognize the slim chances of a fair trial under an increasingly authoritarian regime. "It's a tragic reflection of how activists are being forced into concessions just to mitigate the severity of their punishment," he said.

The verdict has left loved ones of the convicted activists grappling with a profound sense of loss and injustice. Vanessa Chan, whose husband Leung Kwok-hung was among those found guilty, questioned the very nature of the crime: "Both of us love independence, openness, and freedom. What kind of crime has he committed?"

The case is seen as a trial of Hong Kong's pro-democracy movement itself, effectively wiping out the entire political opposition in the city, according to Sunny Cheung, an exiled activist who participated in the 2020 primary. "The survivor guilt is immense," he said, expressing his longing for his fellow activists who fought together for democracy.

As the crackdown intensifies, Hong Kong's commitment to its common law traditions and civil liberties hangs in the balance, with the National Security Law becoming an increasingly potent tool to silence dissenting voices and consolidate Beijing's control over the once-vibrant territory.