-
16:40
-
16:20
-
16:00
-
15:40
-
15:20
-
15:00
-
14:40
-
14:20
-
14:00
-
13:30
-
13:00
-
12:30
-
12:00
-
11:30
-
11:00
-
10:40
-
10:20
-
10:00
-
09:40
-
09:20
-
09:00
-
08:40
-
08:20
-
08:00
-
07:30
-
07:00
A New Path to Peace: US-Hamas Dialogue for a Shift from War
Last week, senior officials from Hamas and the United States expressed a willingness to engage in “a dialogue,” signaling potential future diplomatic moves. This conversation, sparked by Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzouk and US envoy Steve Witkoff, is likely an attempt to test the waters for a shift in strategy, acknowledging the region's volatile situation and the negative consequences of Israel’s ongoing military actions. Both parties seem to recognize that the current trajectory—potentially expanding to Iran—could harm everyone involved.
US President Donald Trump has shown interest in ending conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine, as they distract from broader plans to reshape US foreign relations. At the same time, Hamas has shown its ability to control Gaza during the ceasefire, asserting its political relevance within Palestinian society. Given these developments, the dialogue between the US and Hamas should be taken seriously, as it may benefit the region and beyond. Despite the vast divide—Washington’s complicity in Israel’s destruction of Gaza and Hamas’s designation as a terrorist group by the West—this dialogue is necessary to explore potential paths from militarism to peace.
Hamas has long been demonized in the West, often portrayed as a terrorist organization bent on Israel's destruction. In reality, it has been an effective Palestinian political force, maintaining resistance against Israeli occupation, forging a political agenda, and constantly exploring peaceful solutions to the conflict. Engaging with Hamas does not equate to endorsing its actions, but rather recognizing its complex role in Palestinian politics and resistance.
The key to a potential peaceful resolution lies in understanding Hamas's multiple roles: militaristic, resistant, and pragmatic. It is important to distinguish between these roles to engage Hamas in meaningful peace talks. If an Israeli government ever arises seeking a just peace, this dialogue could clarify whether both sides are truly committed to peace. Historically, Hamas has expressed a willingness to coexist with Israel within the pre-1967 borders, a position reiterated by senior Hamas officials recently.
Despite these offers, peace has been elusive. Israeli leadership, backed by US support, has continually rejected Palestinian peace proposals. Studies show that US-Israeli rejectionism has been a primary obstacle to the peace process, undermining the potential for a two-state solution. Hamas’s stance requires Zionism to define its borders and end its colonial activities, while Palestinians agree to statehood within 22% of historic Palestine.
Achieving peace demands difficult compromises, as seen in historical examples like the end of apartheid in South Africa or the conclusion of US wars in Vietnam and Afghanistan. If Witkoff and Abu Marzouk represent their governments, now is the time to advance a US-Hamas dialogue. We must avoid past mistakes, such as those made during the Oslo Process, where negotiations were undermined by ongoing Israeli territorial expansion.
This moment offers a critical opportunity to move the Middle East from war toward coexistence. It is essential to seize this chance to change the region's destructive course.
