- 17:00Austrian Far-Right Leader Tasked with Forming Government
- 16:40Trina Solar sets a global record for solar module efficiency
- 16:35Dollar Drops Amid Reports of Narrower Tariffs Under Trump
- 16:10Morocco Eyes MAD 12 Billion Export Opportunity in African Markets
- 16:01Key Developments in the Russia-Ukraine Conflict: January 6
- 15:40Morocco Secures Major Soccer Tournaments for 2025 Season
- 15:36Missile Launch Amid Diplomatic Talks: North Korea’s Latest Provocation
- 15:05Palestinian Authority Closes Al Jazeera Platforms in Latest Press Restriction
- 15:00Hamas Offers to Release 34 Israeli Captives Amid Ongoing Gaza Crisis
-
Prayer times
RABAT2025-01-07
Follow us on Facebook
Surrender or Victory : A Divisive Peace Plan for Ukraine
In a tense diplomatic exchange, US Vice President Kamala Harris has strongly criticized proposals to end the war between Ukraine and Russia, labeling them as 'proposals of surrender.' Her remarks came as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy visited the White House to present his "victory plan," a strategy aimed at securing peace on Ukraine's terms.
Speaking directly to Zelenskyy, Harris expressed concern about the pressure Ukraine might face to accept a peace deal that involves ceding sovereign territory and neutrality. She emphasized that such proposals, resembling those of Russian President Vladimir Putin, are not pathways to peace but rather surrender, which the United States finds "dangerous and unacceptable."
While Harris refrained from directly naming Donald Trump and JD Vance, her words echoed the sentiments expressed by the Republican vice-presidential nominee in a recent interview. Zelenskyy had previously denounced Vance's remarks as "too radical," sparking a conflict with Trump allies that has escalated into accusations of election interference.
In a surprising turn of events, Trump announced his intention to meet with Zelenskyy at Trump Tower in New York, seemingly softening his stance. During a press conference, Trump rejected Harris's criticisms, stating that he merely wants to bring an end to the ongoing "horror show." When pressed on whether Ukraine should give up territory, Trump remained non-committal, emphasizing the need for peace and an end to the death and destruction.
The meeting between Zelenskyy and Biden at the White House was a pivotal moment, with Biden offering a substantial military aid package to Ukraine. The assistance includes advanced weaponry, such as medium-range "glide bombs" and additional Patriot air defense systems, aimed at empowering Ukraine's defense capabilities.
However, Biden stopped short of granting Ukraine's request for long-range ballistic missiles, fearing escalation with Russia. The White House press secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre, indicated that no such announcement was expected, reflecting caution within the administration.
Zelenskyy, in his social media post, expressed gratitude for the aid and emphasized its effective and transparent use to achieve a victorious Ukraine and a just peace. Biden further announced a high-level meeting of the Ukraine defense contact group to coordinate aid among allies, despite skepticism from some officials about Zelenskyy's victory plan.
As tensions between Zelenskyy and Trump escalate, the Ukrainian leader has faced criticism from Trump allies, including accusations of election interference. Zelenskyy, in an interview, questioned Trump's ability to stop the war and criticized Vance's vision of peace, which involved ceding Ukrainian territories to Russia.
With the November presidential elections approaching, Zelenskyy faces an uphill battle in securing support for his plan. Senior officials in the Biden administration and European allies have expressed caution, concerned about providing Russia with an escalation pretext.
As the war in Ukraine continues to unfold, the diplomatic efforts and aid packages offered by the United States and its allies play a crucial role in shaping the outcome. The delicate balance between supporting Ukraine's defense and avoiding escalation with Russia remains a challenging task for policymakers.
Comments (0)