Follow us on Facebook

Walaw

Politics

ICC Under Pressure: The Struggle to Hold Israeli Leaders Accountable for Gaza Conflict

Wednesday 02 - 09:20

Zoom

The International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague is facing mounting criticism over its apparent reluctance to issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Yoav Gallant. These leaders are allegedly responsible for the deaths of 42,000 Palestinians in Gaza, raising questions about the court's impartiality and effectiveness in pursuing justice for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The ICC's hesitation stands in stark contrast to its swift action in other cases. For instance, the court issued arrest warrants for Russian President Vladimir Putin and Russian Commissioner for Children's Rights Maria Lvova-Belova within a month of receiving the request. However, four months have passed since ICC Attorney General Karim Khan requested the arrest of Netanyahu, Gallant, and three Hamas leaders for alleged war crimes committed in Gaza since October 7, 2023.

This delay has fueled speculation about external pressure on the court. Khan himself has admitted to facing pressure not to investigate Israeli politicians or submit arrest warrants. Reports suggest that similar tactics were employed against former prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, including alleged threats from former Mossad chief Yossi Cohen.

The United States appears to be at the forefront of efforts to shield Israeli leaders from ICC scrutiny. Twelve U.S. Congress members publicly threatened Khan, warning of consequences if Israel were targeted. Senator Lindsay Graham's remarks at a Congressional hearing further underscore this stance, suggesting that allowing Israel to be tried could set a precedent for future U.S. prosecution.

This situation harkens back to the "Hague Invasion Act" passed by the U.S. Congress in 2002, which authorizes measures against the Netherlands if U.S. personnel face ICC prosecution. While a literal invasion is unlikely, the act exemplifies the lengths to which the U.S. might go to protect its interests and allies from international justice.

The United Kingdom has also played a role in this controversy. The previous Conservative government under Rishi Sunak challenged the ICC's jurisdiction over Palestinian territories. However, the new Labour government led by Keir Starmer has since reversed this position, potentially opening the door for ICC action.

Chief Prosecutor Khan has reaffirmed the court's jurisdiction over occupied Palestinian territories and acknowledged the delay in issuing arrest warrants. He emphasized the importance of demonstrating that international law applies equally to all parties, regardless of their geopolitical standing.

The perceived double standard in the application of international justice is eroding public trust in global institutions. The U.S.'s efforts to use international courts as a tool against Russia while shielding Israel from similar scrutiny have not gone unnoticed. This inconsistency risks undermining the legitimacy of international law and the courts tasked with upholding it.

As pressure mounts on the ICC, the international community watches closely. The court's decision - or lack thereof - regarding Israeli leaders will likely have far-reaching implications for the credibility of international justice systems and the broader global order. At stake is not just the fate of individuals, but the very principle of equal application of law in an increasingly complex geopolitical landscape.