- 17:03LiFtour 2025: Driving insights into Morocco’s economic health through advertising trends
- 16:16CIH Bank reports impressive growth in 2024 financial results
- 15:40New directors appointed for Nador, Agadir airports to enhance operations
- 15:15Morocco's criminal law code open to reform, but concerns linger over DNA database
- 14:40How the USAID cuts under Trump impact Moroccan development efforts
- 14:16Morocco chosen to host African finance ministers’ conference in 2026
- 13:50Travel disruptions escalate as severe weather hampers ferry services between Spain and Morocco
- 13:20Tesla's Canadian dealerships accused of fraud over $43 million in EV rebates
- 12:50Strengthening Africa’s Cybersecurity Landscape at GITEX 2025
-
Prayer times
RABAT2025-03-15
Follow us on Facebook
Legal Battle for Time: Nippon Steel Challenges U.S. Steel Merger Block
Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel have filed a lawsuit to contest President Joe Biden's decision to block their $14.9 billion merger, a move they claim violated their constitutional rights. Although legal experts believe the lawsuit is unlikely to succeed, it could provide the companies with valuable time to explore alternatives or negotiate with incoming President Donald Trump, who has voiced opposition to the deal.
The lawsuit alleges that Biden used a biased national security review process to halt the merger, thereby denying the companies fair treatment. Legal experts suggest the courts are often deferential to executive authority in matters of national security, making the case an uphill battle. However, the companies hope the delay will allow them to seek a resolution under the new administration or adjust the deal's terms to make it more acceptable.
The companies have 30 days to comply with Biden's order to unwind the transaction. While not explicitly seeking to stay the order, the companies may request "preliminary relief" if the government insists on enforcing the timeline. With a merger deadline set for June 18, the lawsuit serves as a critical strategy to buy time.
The legal dispute centers on claims that the national security review, led by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS), was unduly influenced by Biden's political interests. The companies allege that Biden opposed the merger to gain support from union leaders in Pennsylvania, a key state in the presidential election. The White House and union officials have denied these accusations.
Experts note that challenging the CFIUS process is exceptionally difficult, as courts typically avoid reviewing presidential decisions on national security matters. However, the companies argue that Biden’s actions and comments tainted the review process, violating their constitutional rights to due process. While novel, these claims face significant legal hurdles.
Comments (0)