Trump faces lawsuit over paid access service on Truth Social
U.S. President Donald Trump is facing a legal challenge over a paid service launched on Truth Social that offers subscribers early access to posts from prominent accounts, including Trump’s own profile, for fees reaching as much as $100,000 per month.
The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by The Intercept and the Freedom of the Press Foundation. The complaint names Trump, two of his aides and the Executive Office of the President as defendants.
At the center of the case is Truth API, a service developed by Trump Media & Technology Group, the company that owns Truth Social. The platform provides subscribers with rapid access to posts published by ten influential accounts, including those belonging to Trump, Vice President JD Vance and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt.
The subscription reportedly costs $100,000 per month, while customers who commit to a three-year contract can receive a reduced rate of $60,000 per month. The service has attracted particular attention because Truth Social is frequently used by Trump to communicate positions and decisions involving trade policy, foreign affairs and other issues that can influence financial markets.
The lawsuit raises concerns about whether selling early access to politically significant posts could give certain investors or institutions an advantage over the broader public. Such information can potentially affect markets, particularly when presidential posts address tariffs, energy prices, international relations or other economically sensitive matters.
The case also raises questions about Trump’s financial interests in Trump Media & Technology Group and whether he could personally benefit from revenue generated by providing preferential access to posts issued from his account while serving as president.
Another issue concerns the preservation of presidential communications. The service reportedly provides access to an archive containing older Truth Social posts, including material that may have subsequently been deleted or modified.
The plaintiffs are asking the court to declare the arrangement unlawful and to prevent the U.S. administration from relying on Truth Social as an exclusive platform for official communications while the company simultaneously sells premium access to information published through the service.
The lawsuit adds to broader scrutiny surrounding the intersection of presidential communications, private business interests and social media. It could also raise important questions about equal access to information when posts from a sitting president have the potential to influence public debate and financial markets.
-
20:00
-
19:41
-
19:19
-
19:00
-
18:41
-
18:25
-
18:10
-
17:47
-
17:32
-
17:15
-
17:00
-
16:42
-
16:25
-
16:10
-
15:47
-
15:32
-
15:19
-
15:15
-
15:00
-
14:56
-
14:42
-
14:25
-
14:10
-
13:57
-
13:47
-
13:29
-
13:13
-
12:47
-
12:32
-
12:15
-
11:59
-
11:41
-
11:21
-
11:05
-
10:44
-
10:27
-
10:26
-
10:10
-
09:56
-
09:47
-
09:31
-
09:15
-
09:00
-
08:42
-
08:21
-
08:08
-
07:47