- 09:10Turkish court releases journalist as police suppress student protest
- 12:37Protests persist in Turkey despite mass arrests
- 14:10Strong growth of Moroccan traditional handicrafts exports in 2025
- 14:36Council of Europe Congress condemns detention of Istanbul mayor
- 12:36Spain leads NATO's most ambitious naval exercises of the year
- 11:05Turkey's Kizilelma Drone: A Strategic Addition to Morocco's Air Power
- 14:38Pope's first public appearance after recovery from pneumonia
- 08:03Istanbul mayor jailed ahead of corruption trial amid political tensions
- 10:50Global 195 initiative aims to hold Israel accountable for war crimes in Gaza
Follow us on Facebook
Turkish politician faces trial for alleged hate incitement
A prominent Turkish political leader is facing trial on charges of inciting public hatred through social media. The court has ordered the detention of Umit Ozdag, leader of a key political party, for allegedly making inflammatory remarks.
Ozdag was detained after reportedly criticizing President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, stating that “even the crusades had not caused as much harm to Turkiye as Erdogan.” While initially released on charges of insulting the president, prosecutors later issued an arrest warrant accusing him of inciting societal division.
Authorities cited 11 of Ozdag’s social media posts as evidence, including allegations linking him to riots against Syrian refugees in the Kayseri province last year, where numerous homes and businesses were attacked.
In response, Ozdag declared that his arrest represented an attack on those he speaks for, including workers and retirees struggling under economic hardship. He vowed to continue voicing dissent, stating, “You can arrest me, but you cannot silence me without killing me.”
Ozdag, a former academic and vocal critic of the country’s refugee policies, has called for the repatriation of millions of Syrian refugees.
Several opposition figures, including leaders from the main opposition party, have condemned the arrest. They argue that it undermines judicial independence and democracy, labeling it a politically motivated act.
Comments (0)