Iran: Tehran Denies Negotiations With Washington and Maintains Its Seven Conditions

10:10

Iran has firmly rejected claims that it is engaged in negotiations with the United States, reaffirming that any diplomatic engagement must be preceded by the fulfilment of seven conditions set by Tehran. The declaration highlights the continuing divide between the two countries as international efforts to prevent further escalation in the Middle East face significant obstacles.

On Monday, November 9, Iran's Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, Mohsen Rezaei, dismissed statements suggesting that discussions with Washington were underway. In a message published on social media, he accused the American administration of presenting an inaccurate picture of diplomatic contacts and called on the United States to accept Tehran's demands before expecting progress towards an agreement.

Tehran Links Diplomacy to Seven Key Demands

Iran's position centres on a series of political, economic and security requirements that it considers essential to ending the conflict.

Among its principal demands are the lifting of American economic sanctions, the removal of the naval blockade targeting Iranian ports and the release of Iranian financial assets frozen abroad. Tehran is also seeking compensation for the destruction and economic losses caused by the war.

Beyond these economic considerations, Iran wants a reduction in the American military presence across the Middle East and guarantees that hostilities will not resume. Its conditions also extend to ending military confrontations on other regional fronts, particularly in Lebanon and Gaza.

Another important aspect of Tehran's position concerns the scope of future diplomatic discussions. Iranian officials have indicated that their proposed framework does not include new negotiations over the country's nuclear and ballistic missile programmes.

Trump Signals Possible End to Conflict but Keeps Military Option Open

Iran's denial came after US President Donald Trump suggested that communication between Washington and Tehran was taking place and expressed optimism about the possibility of bringing the conflict to an end relatively quickly.

The American president indicated that further military strikes might not be necessary under current circumstances. Nevertheless, he stressed that US forces remained prepared to resume operations should the situation deteriorate.

These statements reflect the uncertainty surrounding Washington's strategy, which appears to combine diplomatic pressure with continued military readiness.

Washington Remains Cautious About Tehran's Conditions

Earlier comments by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also pointed to the difficulties facing diplomatic efforts. While acknowledging that several countries were exploring possible avenues for de-escalation, he indicated that no major breakthrough was imminent.

Rubio also questioned the feasibility of several Iranian demands, suggesting that the positions of the two governments remain far apart.

Regional diplomatic initiatives, including contacts involving Qatar, continue to provide potential channels for communication. However, the absence of an agreed negotiating framework makes it difficult to determine whether these efforts can produce tangible results.

A Fragile Diplomatic Landscape in the Middle East

The disagreement between Iran and the United States extends beyond the immediate question of whether negotiations are taking place. It reflects fundamentally different expectations regarding the conditions required to end the conflict and establish lasting regional stability.

For Tehran, sanctions relief, compensation and changes to the American military presence are central elements of any settlement. Washington, meanwhile, continues to view Iran's nuclear activities and regional military influence as major security concerns.

With both sides maintaining positions that leave little room for immediate compromise, diplomatic mediation faces a difficult test. The coming days could prove decisive in determining whether international efforts can bridge the divide or whether tensions will once again move towards military confrontation.