Explosive Allegations: New Evidence Unveils Ties Between British Bank and Terrorist Funding

In a shocking revelation, newly uncovered evidence suggests that a prominent British bank, Standard Chartered, may have facilitated billions of dollars in transactions linked to entities designated by the United States government as funders of terrorist organizations. These explosive allegations have emerged from court filings submitted to a New York court, casting a dark shadow over the bank's past dealings and reigniting scrutiny over its compliance with international sanctions.

The documents allege that between 2008 and 2013, Standard Chartered conducted thousands of transactions worth more than $100 billion in breach of sanctions imposed on Iran. More alarmingly, an independent expert's analysis has identified $9.6 billion in foreign exchange transactions involving individuals and companies labeled by the U.S. government as financiers of notorious terror groups, including Hezbollah, Hamas, al-Qaeda, and the Taliban.

This startling revelation stands in stark contrast to the bank's previous admissions and settlements. While Standard Chartered has twice acknowledged breaching sanctions against Iran and other countries, paying fines totaling over $1.7 billion in 2012 and 2019, it has steadfastly denied conducting transactions for terrorist organizations.
The transactions in question lay hidden within confidential bank spreadsheets, initially handed over to U.S. authorities in 2012 by two whistleblowers, including a former Standard Chartered executive, Julian Knight. These whistleblowers now allege that U.S. government agencies made false statements to a court to have their claim for a whistleblower's reward dismissed.

In a court filing last Friday, David Scantling, an expert with decades of experience examining illicit bank transactions for the CIA, corroborated the whistleblowers' claims. His declaration states that the spreadsheets contain records of more than half a million separate transactions between 2008 and 2013 that were "cloaked," meaning they were not immediately visible but could be extracted through a simple technique well-known to analysts in his field.
Among these records, Scantling identified numerous transactions by Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) "with or on behalf of Iranian banks, Iranian companies, and Middle Eastern money exchanges that, according to [the U.S. government], finance designated foreign terrorist organizations."

The transactions allegedly include those of a Pakistani fertilizer company, Fatima Fertilizer, known for selling explosive materials used by the Taliban in roadside bombs that killed or maimed thousands of U.K. and U.S. military personnel in Afghanistan. Furthermore, SCB is alleged to have facilitated 73 transactions for a Gambian front company owned by a key Hezbollah financier, Mohammad Ibrahim Bazzi.

Daniel Alter, former general counsel at the New York Department of Financial Services, which first pursued SCB for breaching sanctions, described the new disclosures as "shocking" and "exponentially worse" than what the bank admitted in 2012. "This shows a frightening connection to not just commercial entities, but terrorist organizations, terrorist front companies for organizations such as Hamas, Hezbollah, al-Qaeda, the Taliban—things that make up a regulator's nightmare—and we didn't know that: it was never disclosed to us. And it wasn't apparent in the data that we had," Alter told the BBC. "It's a whole different story."

The revelations have also cast a spotlight on the intervention of former U.K. Chancellor George Osborne, who secretly intervened on the bank's behalf in 2012 when it was at risk of criminal prosecution for money laundering by the U.S. Department of Justice. Osborne wrote to then-Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke and former U.S. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, ultimately leading to the bank escaping prosecution with a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) and a $300 million fine.

While Standard Chartered has dismissed the whistleblowers' claims as "meritless" and expressed confidence in the courts' rejection of these allegations, the whistleblowers maintain that U.S. authorities have perpetrated "a colossal fraud on this court by falsely denying" the existence of "previously unknown, damning evidence."
As the legal battle unfolds, the banking industry and global financial watchdogs will undoubtedly scrutinize these explosive allegations and their potential implications for anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing efforts. The potential consequences for Standard Chartered, should these allegations be proven true, could be far-reaching and reverberate throughout the international banking landscape. Cop