X

Harris's rise in Politics Made her the Newest recipient of DEI-Related Criticisms

Harris's rise in Politics Made her the Newest recipient of DEI-Related Criticisms
Wednesday 31 July 2024 - 15:30
Zoom

In a tense political climate, Vice President Kamala Harris, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, has become the focus of a contentious narrative that has long affected marginalized individuals across various spheres of society. This rhetoric, which questions the merit of her achievements, has sparked a fierce debate about the nature of success and representation in American politics.

Recent comments from Republican representatives have brought this issue into the national spotlight. Representative Harriett Hageman of Wyoming characterized Harris as "one of the weakest candidates" in the country's history, suggesting her position was due to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) considerations rather than merit. Similarly, Representative Tim Burchett of Tennessee implied on social media that Harris's rise was the result of DEI policies rather than her qualifications.

These statements have resonated with many Black professionals, especially those working in the DEI field. They perceive such remarks as an extension of longstanding racial tropes used to undermine the accomplishments of people of color in positions of power.

Susan Rice, a prominent Black political figure with an impressive resume including roles as U.N. Ambassador and National Security Advisor, addressed the issue on CNN. She argued that labeling someone a "DEI hire" implies their success is undeserved and stems from unfair advantages rather than merit. This sentiment, she stated, is deeply insulting to a large segment of the American population.

The attacks on Harris intensified following President Biden's announcement on July 21 that he would not seek re-election and would endorse Harris for the November election against former President Trump.

Fatimah Gilliam, author of "Race Rules: What Your Black Friend Won't Tell You," views these comments as a new manifestation of old prejudices. She emphasizes Harris's extensive qualifications, including her roles as California's Attorney General, U.S. Senator, and nearly a full term as Vice President. Gilliam argues that the "DEI candidate" label is a thinly veiled attempt to delegitimize Harris's achievements.

The controversy extends beyond Harris, with DEI professionals noting a broader trend of undermining Black individuals in positions of power. Similar rhetoric has been used against other prominent Black figures, including Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott and Maryland Governor Wes Moore.

Not all conservatives align with this narrative. Samuel Rivers Jr., a former South Carolina state representative and self-described "hardcore Republican," expressed his disagreement with the attacks on Harris. While he opposes her policies, he acknowledges her track record of multiple elections and argues that her position is earned.

Some Republican strategists warn that such attacks may backfire, suggesting that the Trump campaign should focus on policy differences instead. However, experts like Tana Session and Loretta Muldrow anticipate that these rhetorical assaults may intensify as the election approaches.

Nika White, a DEI consultant, offers a different perspective on the situation. She interprets the increased frequency and intensity of these attacks as evidence that Harris is perceived as a genuine threat due to her qualifications and competencies.

As the political landscape continues to evolve, the discourse surrounding Harris's candidacy highlights deeper societal tensions about race, merit, and representation in American politics. The coming months are likely to see further debates on these issues as the nation moves towards the November election.


Read more