X

Moroccan Women's Rights Advocates Raise Alarm Over Proposed Legal Reform

Moroccan Women's Rights Advocates Raise Alarm Over Proposed Legal Reform
Friday 21 June 2024 - 12:42
Zoom

In a significant development drawing concern from women's rights activists in Morocco, Justice Minister Abdellatif Ouahbi has proposed the removal of "public prosecution in disputes where the state is not a party." This potential legal reform has been met with considerable skepticism within the country's women's rights movement.

Critics argue that the failure to explicitly exempt cases of rape, violence, and pedophilia could lead to increased impunity for offenders. During a recent Justice and Legislation Committee meeting on the Civil Procedure Bill, the minister's remarks notably omitted any mention of these exceptions, prompting scrutiny from human rights observers.

The minister's oversight suggests it could ignite a "human rights controversy." This lack of clarity has been seen as disregarding persistent calls from Moroccan human rights and women's rights organizations to completely exclude these cases from conciliation.

Fatiha Chtato, a lawyer and human rights advocate, acknowledged the importance of alleviating pressure on the judiciary through conciliation measures but emphasized the critical need to protect certain cases from such processes. "Violence against women, rape, and sexual assaults on children should never be subjected to reconciliation and mediation," Chtato stressed, warning that allowing such practices could result in impunity for offenders and a setback in women's rights protection.

Chtato further cautioned against reverting to the controversial practice of marrying rape victims to their assailants to avoid legal repercussions. She emphasized the necessity of maintaining judicial protection for women and children, who she described as society's most vulnerable members.

The proposed reform has also raised concerns about potential manipulation of the legal system. Chtato pointed out instances where financial compensation or private settlements outside of court oversight could undermine justice, a practice long criticized by women's rights advocates.

Latifa Bouchoua, a human rights activist and former president of the Federation of Women's Rights Leagues, echoed these concerns. She stressed the importance of carefully determining which cases are appropriate for reconciliation, arguing that disputes involving fundamental rights or gender discrimination, such as violence against women, should not be subject to conciliation.

Both Chtato and Bouchoua acknowledged the potential benefits of mediation in certain cases but emphasized that any such processes must uphold universal civil principles and human rights standards. They called for broad input from activists to safeguard against any regression in women's rights.

Bouchoua underscored the enduring challenges faced by Moroccan women, citing cultural and societal barriers that often prevent them from seeking justice. She insisted on continued state involvement in severe cases of violence or pedophilia, advocating for public prosecutors to retain the authority to initiate legal proceedings automatically.

The activists warned against allowing "mediated deals" or financial settlements in cases involving severe violence or pedophilia, cautioning that such practices could victimize individuals under the guise of legal resolution. They demanded explicit exemptions in the legislation to ensure no waivers are granted in these cases, securing ongoing state involvement as a party in litigation.

As Morocco debates this potential legal reform, the voices of women's rights advocates continue to advocate for careful consideration and robust safeguards to protect society's most vulnerable. The outcome of this deliberation holds profound implications for the future of women's rights and justice in the North African nation.


Read more