- 16:10Lions of the Atlas prepare for 2026 World Cup qualifiers at Mohammed VI Complex
- 15:50French winemakers turn to Morocco's argan tree amid drought challenges
- 15:38Les Impériales unveil first insights from the 2035 prospective study
- 15:20Russia pursues renewal of fisheries agreement with Morocco
- 15:10Astronauts return to Earth after extended stay on space station
- 14:50Discover the Spanish cities where saving is most achievable in 2025
- 14:38Ayuso defends "Spanish liberalism" in London
- 14:20Spain targets wealth disparity in new tax control initiative
- 14:10Peru Declares State of Emergency Amid Rising Crime Wave
Follow us on Facebook
Trudeau Dismisses Trump's Annexation Remarks as a Distraction Strategy
On January 9, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau criticized U.S. President-elect Donald Trump for suggesting the possible annexation of Canada, calling it a diversionary tactic aimed at shifting focus away from the repercussions of proposed tariffs.
Trump recently announced plans to impose a 25% tariff on all Canadian imports unless Canada enhances its border security. During a public statement, he mentioned the possibility of using economic measures to acquire Canada.
Addressing the remarks, Trudeau described Trump as a "skillful negotiator" whose statements were intended to distract the public from the potential economic impact of the tariffs. He explained that the move would make essential goods such as oil, gas, electricity, steel, aluminum, lumber, and concrete significantly more expensive for American consumers.
Trudeau reaffirmed his stance, emphasizing that Canada has no intention of becoming part of the United States. He reiterated that Ottawa would respond with countermeasures if Trump followed through on the threats. Reflecting on a past trade dispute in 2018, Trudeau reminded the audience of Canada's retaliatory tariffs on products such as ketchup, playing cards, bourbon, and motorcycles to strategically impact American industries.
However, Trudeau expressed a reluctance to escalate tensions, emphasizing the negative consequences for both Canadian consumers and the strong economic ties between the two nations.
Comments (0)