- 16:12Rental prices in Barcelona decrease by 6.4% after rent control measures, but challenges remain
- 15:44SpaceX crew replaces stranded astronauts on the ISS
- 15:06Winter weather alerts in Spain amid snow and low temperatures
- 14:40Xi Jinping declines EU invitation for anniversary summit
- 14:10Trump administration freezes US-funded media operations
- 13:45Australian teen Gout Gout shatters records with world-leading 200m performance
- 13:16Collective pressure on Russia to reach a ceasefire agreement
- 12:44Israeli airstrike kills nine in Gaza amid ceasefire tensions
- 12:11Canada reassesses the purchase of American fighter jets
Follow us on Facebook
Morocco Upholds Human Rights: Court Blocks Extradition of Egyptian Political Dissident
The Moroccan judiciary has taken a decisive stance on human rights by refusing to extradite Egyptian political dissident and physician Dr. Abdel Basset Imam to Egypt, where he faces a life sentence for opposing the current government.
Dr. Imam, who holds both Turkish and Egyptian citizenship, expressed his gratitude to King Mohammed VI and Moroccan authorities for their decision. Speaking to Arabi21, he praised the Moroccan judicial system for delivering what he described as justice in his case.
The Court of Cassation in Rabat ordered Dr. Imam's release, marking a significant development in his case. Initially detained on November 3 at Casablanca Airport while traveling from Turkey using his Turkish passport, Dr. Imam had been facing potential extradition to Egypt, where he had received a life imprisonment sentence for his opposition to President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi's administration.
During his time in Moroccan custody, Dr. Imam noted the exceptional standards of the country's detention facilities, highlighting services and conditions he described as uncommon in other jurisdictions. He specifically commended the Moroccan authorities for what he characterized as their fair and just handling of his case.
This ruling underscores Morocco's commitment to judicial independence and raises important questions about the treatment of political dissidents in the region. The decision has implications for international relations and human rights practices in North Africa and the Middle East.
Comments (0)