French Political Aide Accused of Racist Remarks Against Moroccan Individuals

Saturday 27 July 2024 - 11:40

Julie Gahinet, a parliamentary aide to French politician Julien Odoul, is embroiled in controversy as allegations surface accusing her of making racially charged remarks towards three Moroccan individuals. Despite her vehement denials, witnesses have corroborated the claims, prompting the three French Moroccans to file formal complaints.

The incident, which has sparked widespread attention, reportedly transpired during a heated exchange at a Paris restaurant on July 17. Gahinet is alleged to have insulted the group by declaring, “You Are Not Real French,” and directed derogatory comments towards one individual’s appearance.

According to the plaintiffs, Gahinet further inflamed the situation by proclaiming, “I am at home; I am a blonde, blue-eyed Frenchwoman.” She allegedly gestured to emphasize the difference in their skin color and demanded they leave, asserting, “The French do not want French people like you.”

In response to these serious accusations, Gahinet has issued a public statement categorically denying any wrongdoing. “I refute all your information and deny the racist accusations made against me, which are mere fabrications,” she stated, hinting at her intention to pursue legal action for defamation.

The allegations were first reported by StreetPress, which highlighted the backgrounds of the plaintiffs. One of the complainants, who moved from Morocco to France for higher education, is now a naturalized French citizen. The other two plaintiffs, both 36 years old, are also of Moroccan descent and were present during the incident.

The trio has lodged a complaint for “public insult against an individual based on their race, religion, or origin,” an offense under French law that carries a potential sentence of up to one year in prison and a €45,000 fine.

As the case unfolds, it underscores the ongoing issues of racial discrimination and social integration within the French society. The outcome of this legal battle could have significant implications for public discourse on these sensitive matters.