Ramadan Reckoning: Morocco's Ban on Public Eating Sparks Intense Debate

As the holy month of Ramadan unfolds in Morocco, an age-old controversy resurfaces with fervor – the contentious implementation of Article 222, which criminalizes public eating during fasting hours. This divisive law has reignited heated discussions, pitting advocates aiming to uphold religious sanctity against opponents championing individual freedoms.

Article 222, enshrined in the Moroccan Penal Code, stipulates: "A person known to be Muslim who violates the fast in a public place during Ramadan, without one of the justifications allowed by Islam, shall face imprisonment of one to six months and a fine of 200 dirhams."

Supporters of the law argue for its necessity in preserving the sanctity of Ramadan and honoring the religious sentiments of the predominantly Muslim population. Conversely, detractors condemn it as an infringement on personal liberties, contradicting principles of human rights.

Social media platforms have become battlegrounds, with campaigns emerging on both sides – proponents advocating for strict enforcement and crackdowns on public eating, while critics demand the immediate repeal of this antiquated statute.

Ahmed Assid, a prominent Moroccan researcher and human rights activist, strongly criticized the law, emphasizing, "The annual enforcement of the prohibition on eating during Ramadan underscores the deep-rooted nature of the issue, which can only be resolved by recognizing individuals' rights to choose their lifestyle and beliefs."

Assid further highlighted the Islamic principle that fasting is a personal commitment between the believer and the Divine, not subject to worldly punishment for infractions. "In Islam, there is no earthly punishment for those who eat during Ramadan because fasting is a pillar based on a vertical relationship between the individual believer and their Lord," he explained.

In an effort to spur political action toward repealing Article 222, the Deleuze Policy Institute launched the "Eating is Not a Crime" campaign, engaging parliamentarians across the political spectrum. Although no formal responses have been received, the institute remains resolute in its mission to safeguard human rights and foster dialogue.

Youssef Day, the institute's director, disclosed informal discussions with some Members of Parliament (MPs), stating, "We have sought official meetings with MPs from major political parties... to address the abolition of the law."

Tracing the origins of Article 222 to the French colonial era under Marshal Hubert Lyautey, Assid argued that the law was initially enacted to prevent clashes between French settlers and the local Muslim populace. However, he contended that post-independence, the law lost its relevance, becoming an outdated artifact incompatible with modern Moroccan society.

Moulay Said Alaoui, a prominent lawyer and human rights activist, echoed calls for repeal, articulating, "The faction opposing Article 222 advocates from a human rights perspective, asserting that the decision to fast or not should primarily belong to individuals, not society."

Amid the ongoing debate, voices from various quarters advocate for a delicate balance between preserving individual liberties and maintaining social cohesion. Researcher Mohamed Abdelouahab Rafiqui encapsulated this sentiment, suggesting, "Perhaps we not only need to amend the law, but also to clarify the value of individual freedoms and their impact on practical activities and individual productivity."

With arrests and public humiliations over alleged violations fueling discontent, the need for resolution becomes increasingly urgent. As Morocco grapples with this intricate interplay of faith, freedom, and societal harmony, the ramifications of this crucial dialogue extend far beyond Ramadan, shaping the nation's path toward a future where personal liberties and religious traditions coexist harmoniously.