US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship and rejects Trump executive order
The US Supreme Court has reaffirmed the constitutional principle of birthright citizenship, ruling that children born on American soil are entitled to US citizenship regardless of the immigration status of their parents. The decision rejects an executive order issued by President Donald Trump that sought to limit automatic citizenship for certain children born in the United States. In its ruling, the Court confirmed that individuals born within the United States are protected under the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which grants citizenship to those born or naturalized in the country and subject to its jurisdiction. The justices concluded that children born to parents who are in the United States without legal status or on temporary visas remain covered by this constitutional protection. The decision reinforces a legal interpretation that has guided US citizenship policy for more than a century. During oral arguments earlier this year, several justices indicated support for preserving the long-established understanding that birthplace, rather than a parent's immigration status, determines eligibility for citizenship. The executive order, signed by President Trump at the beginning of his current term, aimed to deny automatic citizenship documents to children born in the United States if their parents were living in the country unlawfully or lacked permanent legal status. The policy immediately faced multiple legal challenges from civil rights organizations, immigration advocates, and several states, which argued that it conflicted with the Constitution. Legal experts say the Supreme Court's decision provides renewed clarity on one of the country's most significant constitutional protections while reaffirming the authority of the Fourteenth Amendment. The ruling also underscores the judiciary's role in reviewing executive actions that raise constitutional questions. Birthright citizenship has long been a subject of political debate in the United States, particularly in discussions surrounding immigration reform. Supporters argue that it reflects the Constitution's commitment to equal protection under the law, while critics have called for changes through constitutional amendment or legislative reform. Although the Court's decision settles the legal challenge to the executive order, immigration policy is expected to remain a central issue in US political debate, with lawmakers continuing to discuss broader reforms affecting border security, legal immigration, and pathways to citizenship.
-
17:30
-
17:00
-
16:30
-
16:25
-
16:22
-
16:00
-
15:30
-
15:00
-
14:48
-
14:30
-
14:00
-
13:30
-
13:15
-
13:00
-
12:30
-
12:00
-
11:45
-
11:30
-
11:15
-
11:00
-
10:45
-
10:30
-
10:15
-
10:00
-
09:55
-
09:45
-
09:30
-
09:15
-
09:00
-
23:15
-
23:00
-
22:00
-
21:00
-
20:00
-
19:45
-
19:30
-
19:15
-
19:00
-
18:45
-
18:30
-
18:15
-
18:00
