-
18:00
-
17:40
-
17:20
-
17:00
-
16:50
-
16:30
-
16:00
-
15:40
-
15:20
-
15:00
-
14:40
-
14:20
-
14:00
-
13:30
-
13:00
-
12:40
-
12:20
-
12:00
-
11:40
-
11:20
-
11:00
-
10:40
-
10:20
-
10:00
-
09:30
-
09:00
-
08:30
-
08:00
-
07:30
-
07:00
Trump administration moves to cut $4.9 billion in foreign aid for 2025
The Trump administration has announced plans to cancel $4.9 billion (MAD 53.9 billion) in U.S. foreign aid for the fiscal year 2025, targeting funds already approved by Congress. This includes significant contributions to the United Nations and its specialized agencies.
The White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) confirmed the decision in a post on X, stating, “President Trump CANCELED $4.9 billion (MAD 53.9 billion) in U.S. foreign aid using a pocket rescission,” emphasizing that the administration remains committed to its “America First” strategy.
Pocket rescission: An unusual move
In a 20-page document sent to Congress, the administration outlined its unprecedented use of a pocket rescission—a rarely invoked executive power that allows the president to reclaim funds late in the fiscal year without legislative approval. The timing of the move gives Congress insufficient time to override the decision, as the U.S. fiscal year ends on September 30, weeks before the 45-day review period required for rescission requests expires.
This marks the administration’s first attempt to employ the pocket rescission process, raising concerns about its potential to bypass Congress on significant budgetary matters.
Key areas of reduction
The largest portion of the proposed cuts—$3.2 billion (MAD 35.2 billion)—targets development programs managed by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Other significant reductions include:
- $521 million (MAD 5.7 billion) in contributions to international organizations, including the United Nations and its specialized agencies.
- $445 million (MAD 4.9 billion) allocated for peacekeeping operations (PKO).
- $393 million (MAD 4.3 billion) in funding for the International Peacekeeping Activities (CIPA) program.
Far-reaching consequences
If implemented, the proposed cuts could drastically disrupt U.S. foreign assistance programs and peacekeeping initiatives worldwide. Experts warn that the move may erode support for international organizations and jeopardize ongoing development and humanitarian efforts in conflict zones.
The decision also risks further complicating negotiations in Congress over government funding for the next fiscal year, which begins in October. Lawmakers may face increased pressure to address the potential consequences of reduced foreign aid on global stability and America’s international standing.
