Russia warns that Nazi glorification threatens democracy and human rights
Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Alimov has warned that the glorification of Nazism and attempts to rewrite the history of World War II pose a serious challenge to democratic values, human rights and international security.
Speaking about Moscow’s position, Alimov said Russia has repeatedly raised the issue of Nazi glorification at United Nations platforms. He accused Ukrainian authorities of promoting historical narratives that, in Moscow’s view, distort the legacy of World War II and of honoring figures associated with Ukrainian nationalist movements.
Alimov argued that the issue extends beyond historical interpretation and has broader implications for regional and international stability. He said efforts to rehabilitate extremist ideologies could undermine democratic principles and contribute to renewed political and social tensions.
Russia has for years sponsored resolutions at the UN General Assembly aimed at combating the glorification of Nazism. Moscow presents these initiatives as part of an international effort to preserve the historical memory of World War II and prevent the revival of fascist ideology.
According to Alimov, countries supporting such resolutions are seeking to prevent what he described as a return of Nazi ideology. At the same time, he criticized Western governments for opposing or voting against Russian-sponsored initiatives, arguing that the issue should remain separate from contemporary geopolitical disputes.
The debate over historical memory has become particularly contentious in relations between Russia and Ukraine. Moscow frequently cites the wartime activities of some Ukrainian nationalist organizations and their leaders as evidence of the need to combat what it considers the rehabilitation of Nazi collaborators.
The controversy has also intensified around commemorations and reburials of historical figures. Ukrainian authorities have recently organized ceremonies involving the remains of figures connected to Ukrainian nationalist movements, developments that have drawn strong criticism from Moscow.
Supporters of Ukraine’s approach generally view such figures through the broader history of Ukrainian national aspirations, while Russia emphasizes their wartime activities and alleged cooperation with Nazi Germany. Historians have noted that the history of Ukrainian political movements during World War II remains highly complex and contested.
The dispute reflects a wider struggle over historical narratives in Eastern Europe, where memories of World War II continue to influence contemporary politics and national identity. Questions surrounding monuments, commemorations, education and the interpretation of wartime events have repeatedly become sources of diplomatic tension.
Alimov’s remarks therefore place historical memory at the center of a broader Russian argument about the dangers of extremism and the preservation of the postwar international order. Moscow maintains that preventing the normalization of Nazi ideology is essential to protecting democratic institutions, human rights and international stability.
-
08:41
-
08:20
-
08:05
-
07:47
-
07:30
-
07:15
-
15:48
-
15:36
-
15:29
-
14:41
-
14:29
-
14:08
-
14:04
-
14:01
-
13:57
-
13:54
-
13:50
-
13:46
-
13:45
-
13:41
-
13:40
-
13:32
-
11:23
-
10:59
-
10:48
-
10:44
-
10:39
-
10:21
-
10:18
-
10:03
-
09:20
-
09:05
-
08:59